Table 1 Influence of CETM and P-fertilization practices on grain starch content (%), starch yield (kg ha−1), protein content (%) and protein yield (kg ha−1) in maize under MWCS.

From: Double zero tillage and foliar phosphorus fertilization coupled with microbial inoculants enhance maize productivity and quality in a maize–wheat rotation

Treatment

Starch (%)

Starch yield (kg ha−1)

Protein content (%)

Protein yield (kg ha−1)

2018

2019

Mean

2018

2019

Mean

2018

2019

Mean

2018

2019

Mean

CETM practices

FBCT–FBCT

64.5

64.2

64.4

3511

3494

3503

8.85

8.91

8.88

481.4

483.0

482.2

RBCT–RBZT

65.5

64.6

65.1

3774

3836

3805

9.18

9.22

9.20

527.8

538.2

533.0

FBZT–FBZT

65.5

65.3

65.4

3752

3798

3775

9.12

9.38

9.25

520.6

543.3

531.9

PRBZT–PRBZT

67.4

67.0

67.2

4113

4202

4157

9.17

9.50

9.33

558.3

589.5

573.9

CD (p = 0.05)

NS

NS

NS

362

438

307

NS

0.30

0.3

34.0

49.4

29.1

P–fertilization practices

P100

66.3

65.9

66.1

3681

3767

3724

9.10

9.35

9.23

505.2

528.0

516.6

P50 + 2FSP

67.0

67.1

67.0

3854

3914

3884

9.30

9.62

9.46

535.9

560.5

548.2

P50 + PSB + AMF

64.9

65.3

65.1

3855

3906

3881

9.23

9.43

9.33

548.2

563.6

555.9

P50 + PSB + AMF + 2FSP

68.6

69.2

68.9

4288

4413

4350

9.48

9.70

9.59

591.9

619.8

605.6

P0

62.1

61.0

61.5

3260

3163

3211

8.28

8.15

8.22

428.9

421.2

425.0

CD (p = 0.05)

4.3

4.2

4.1

354

358

321

0.49

0.43

0.45

30.9

32.8

24.4

Interaction

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

NS

S

NS

  1. CD values indicate the critical difference at p = 0.05.