Table 3 Comparison of Naia’s interdental widths with other reported populations.
From: Unexpected malocclusion in a 13,000-Year-old Late Pleistocene young woman from Mexico
Year | Naia | Normando16 | Bălan13 | Sayin9 | Uysal14 | Lombardo10 | Oliva11 | Forster12 | Alkadhi15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2022 | 2016 | 2014 | 2004 | 2005 | 2013 | 2018 | 2008 | 2018 | ||||
Population sample | N/A | Xicrin-Kaiapó | Arara-Laranjal | Arara-Iriri | Assurini | Romania | Turkey | Turkey | Systematic Review | Italy | USA | Saudi Arabia |
Angle class/sex | CII Div 1/female | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | CII Div 1/M&F | CII Div 1/M&F | CII Div 1/M&F | CII Div 1/M&F | CI/Females | NA/Females | CI/Females |
Upper arch | ||||||||||||
Maxillary intercanine width | 33.87 | 36.04* | 36.1* | 37.73* | 38.78* | 33.9 | 33.56 | 34 | 33.59^ | 32.66 | 32.15 | 33.71 |
Maxillary first premolar width I | 38.16 | 39.9 | 39.46 | 39.9 | 39.93^ | 38.68 | 40.35* | |||||
Maxillary first premolar width II | 32.33 | 36.39* | 34.28* | |||||||||
Maxillary second premolar width I | 46.55 | 44.32 | 43.46 | 44.68* | ||||||||
Maxillary second premolar width II | 40.41 | 38.97* | ||||||||||
Maxillary intermolar width I | 50.55 | 53.54* | 53.34* | 53.67* | 56.2* | 51.9 | 50 | 52.1 | 50.95^ | 49.03 | 49.21* | |
Maxillary intermolar width II | 45.88 | 45.5 | 44.28 | 44.16 | 43.42* | |||||||
Lower arch | ||||||||||||
Mandibular intercanine width | 26.36 | 27.55 | 27.56 | 28.14* | 29.08* | 27.9 | 26.8 | 27.9 | 29.08^ | 25.45 | 24.11* | 26.02* |
Mandibular first premolar width I | 33.94 | 34.7 | 34.58 | 34.8 | 38.34^ | 31.95 | 33.79 | |||||
Mandibular first premolar width II | 29.52 | 29.91 | 30.57* | |||||||||
Mandibular intermolar width I | 44.93 | 45.23 | 45.32 | 45.26 | 47.65* | 46.2 | 43.7 | 46.8 | 49.98^ | 42.52 | 43.67* | |
Mandibular intermolar width II | 41.48 | 41.17 | 39.22 | 39.51* |