Table 2 Additive and dominant effects of SSSLs on plant height at various developmental stages compared with HJX74.

From: Dynamic analysis of QTLs on plant height with single segment substitution lines in rice

SSSL

Effect

QTL

t1

t2

t3

t4

t5

t6

t7

t8

t9

S1

a

QTL(t)

     

− 14.85*

− 6.63**

− 9.53**

− 12.97**

  

QTL(t|t − 1)

     

− 6.57**

 

− 3.75**

 
 

d

QTL(t)

       

− 6.55**

− 7.71**

  

QTL(t|t − 1)

       

− 4.96**

 

S2

a

QTL(t)

   

4.28*

4.40*

4.87*

4.14*

  
  

QTL(t|t − 1)

         
 

d

QTL(t)

   

4.62*

4.45*

   

5.50*

  

QTL(t|t − 1)

        

5.03**

S3

a

QTL(t)

      

4.97*

4.74*

6.50*

  

QTL(t|t − 1)

         

S4

a

QTL(t)

     

6.07**

6.92**

5.11*

5.83*

  

QTL(t|t − 1)

     

5.60**

   
 

d

QTL(t)

 

6.22*

 

6.87**

6.29**

6.83**

9.37**

5.77*

4.87*

  

QTL(t|t − 1)

   

3.39*

 

3.82*

   

S5

d

QTL(t)

   

5.19*

     
  

QTL(t|t − 1)

         
  1. SSSL is the abbreviation of the single segment substitution line. Si represented ith SSSL. a and d were additive and dominant effects, respectively, estimated by the mean of \(S_{i} - HJX74\)(where i represented ith SSSL that was homozygote or heterozygote). QTL(t) and QTL(t|t − 1) represent unconditional and conditional QTLs at stage t, respectively. \(t_{i}\) indicated various developmental stages 7 days apart. Sign “–” indicates descending plant height due to alleles from donors. Superscripts “* and **”Indicate significance at the 5% and 1% levels, respectively.
Back to article page