Table 8 Performance comparison between a W-Net and a U-Net configured to have a comparable amount of weights.
From: State-of-the-art retinal vessel segmentation with minimalistic models
# Params | DRIVE | CHASE-DB | HRF | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC | DICE | AUC | DICE | AUC | DICE | ||
“Big” U-Net | 76,213 | 98.00 | 82.53 | 98.29 | 81.09 | 98.15 | 80.73 |
Little W-Net | 68,482 | 98.09 | 82.78 | 98.44 | 81.52 | 98.24 | 81.05 |
W-Net vs U-Net | \(-\) 7731 | +0.09 p<0.05 | +0.25 p<0.05 | +0.15 p<0.05 | +0.43 p<0.05 | +0.09 p<0.05 | +0.32 p<0.05 |
