Table 1 The results of Kendall correlation analysis. Compared: Signal characteristics vs. pathology measures. Width: Width of the digital section marking. Bandpass (Hz): Frequency spectrum analysed. Rho: Correlation coefficient. P: P-value.
From: Spatial analysis of photoplethysmography in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma
Compared | Width | Bandpass (Hz) | Rho | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Flow vs. width | 2 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 3 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 3 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 4 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 4 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 5 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 5 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 6 | 0.08<f<0.15 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 6 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 7 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 8 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 9 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Flow vs. width | 10 | 0.02<f<0.08 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 1 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 1 | f<2 | −0.35 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 1 | f<5 | −0.36 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 2 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 2 | f<2 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 2 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 3 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 3 | f<2 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 3 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 8 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 8 | f<2 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 8 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 9 | f<1 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. width | 9 | f<5 | −0.34 | 0.01 |
Phase shift vs. area | 1 | f<1 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 1 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 1 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 2 | f<1 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 2 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 2 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 3 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 3 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 3 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 4 | f<1 | −0.38 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 4 | f<2 | −0.38 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 4 | f<5 | −0.38 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 5 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 5 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 5 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 6 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 6 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 6 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 7 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 7 | f<2 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 7 | f<5 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 8 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 8 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 8 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 9 | f<1 | −0.40 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 9 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 9 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 10 | f<1 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 10 | f<2 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Phase shift vs. area | 10 | f<5 | −0.39 | <0.005 |
Standard deviation vs. area | 2 | f<1 | 0.34 | 0.01 |
