Table 2 Effect of culture medium and embryokine treatment of embryos on pregnancy outcome at day 30 of gestation and calving for one farm in which data at calving were recorded.

From: Actions of CSF2 and DKK1 on bovine embryo development and pregnancy outcomes are affected by composition of embryo culture medium

Medium

Embryokine

Pregnant at day 30, fraction and percenta

Calving rate, fraction and percentb

Pregnancy loss, day 30 to calving, fraction and percentc

No serum

Vehicle

10/18 (55.6%)

8/18 (44.4%)

2/10 (20.0%)

No serum

CSF2

4/13 (30.8%)

2/13 (15.4%)

2/4 (50.0%)

No serum

DKK1

5/16 (31.3%)

5/16 (31.3%)

0/5 (0.0%)

Knockout serum replacer

Vehicle

8/25 (32.0%)

2/25 (8.0%)

6/8 (75.0%)

Knockout serum replacer

CSF2

17/41 (41.5%)

7/41 (17.1%)

10/17 (58.8%)

Knockout serum replacer

DKK1

9/25 (36.0%)

7/25 (28.0%)

2/9 (22.2%)

Fetal bovine serum

Vehicle

13/40 (32.5%)

7/40 (17.5%)

6/13 (46.2%)

Fetal bovine serum

CSF2

17/39 (43.6%)

14/39 (35.9%)

3/17 (17.7%)

Fetal bovine serum

DKK1

26/49 (53.1%)

20/49 (40.8%)

6/26 (23.1%)

  1. Abbreviations are as follow: BSA bovine serum albumin, CSF2 colony stimulating factor 2, DKK1 dickopf WNT signaling pathway inhibitor- 1.
  2. aThere was an interaction between no serum vs (SR + FBS) and vehicle vs DKK1 (P = 0.084).
  3. bCalving rate was affected by medium (P = 0.079). Analysis of contrasts indicated that serum replacement (SR) differed from fetal bovine serum (FBS) (P = 0.027), and there were interactions between no serum vs (SR + FBS) and vehicle vs CSF2 (P = 0.050) and no serum vs (SR + FBS) and vehicle vs DKK1 (P = 0.051).
  4. cThere were no effects of medium, embryokine or the interaction (P ≥ 0.10).