Table 1 Literature summary on MAAS, SART, and ES of MW measures.
From: On the relationship between mind wandering and mindfulness
Citation | Measures used | Reliability estimates | Estimates of association | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAAS | SART (acc) | SART (RT) | ES of MW | N | MAAS | SART (acc) | SART (RT) | ES of MW | SART (acc) and MAAS | SART (RT) and MAAS | ES of MW and MAAS | ||||
Mrazek et al. 20123 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\) | 113 | 0.85 | – | – | – | − 0.23 | * | – | − 0.22 | * | |
Smil ek et al. 201046 | \(\checkmark\) \(^\text {a}\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | 363 | – | – | – | – | 0.22\(^\text {a}\) | ** | − 0.16\(^\text {a}\) | *** | – | |
Cheyne et al . 2006 (Exp. 1)47 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | 449 | 0.87 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Cheyne et al. 2006 (Exp. 2)47 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | 504 | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.98 | – | − 0.31 | *** | 0.17 | *** | – | |
Brown and Ryan 200331 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | 74–327 | 0.80–0.87 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Park et al. 201332 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | Review | 0.87–0.92 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Deng et al. 20144 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\)\(^\text {c}\) | 23 | – | – | – | – | − 0.45 | * | – | 0.44\(^\text {c}\) | * | |
Nayda et al. 20215 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\)\(^\text {c}\) | 200 | 0.85 | – | – | – | − 0.23 | ** | – | 0.31\(^\text {c}\) | *** | |
Sofuoglu et al. 200841 | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\) \(^\text {e}\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | 11 | – | 0.94–0.98 | – | – | – | – | – | |||
O’Connel et al . 200942 | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | 13 | – | 0.87, 0.89 | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Mc Vay and K ane 200943 | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\) \(^\text {b}\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 244 | – | 0.95\(^\text {b}\) | 0.93 | 0.89 | – | – | – | |||
Unsworth and McMillian 201444 | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 252 | – | 0.83 | 0.92 | – | – | – | – | |||
Kane et al. 201645 | \(\times\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 472 | – | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.93 | – | – | – | |||
McKillop et al. 200748 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | 727 | 0.89 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Michalak et al. 200849 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | 469 | 0.83 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
Medvedev et al. 201650 | \(\checkmark\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | \(\times\) | 250 | 0.87 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |||
This stu dy (GUP) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) \(^\text {d}\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 313 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.98 | 0.91 | 0.03\(^\text {d}\) | n.s. | 0.06 | n.s. | − 0.29 | *** |
This study (EPP) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) \(^\text {d}\) | \(\checkmark\) | \(\checkmark\) | 228 | 0.88 | 0.71 | 0.99 | 0.89 | 0.13\(^\text {d}\) | * | − 0.06 | n.s. | 0.041 | n.s. |
