Table 2 Sample difference tests.

From: On the relationship between mind wandering and mindfulness

Measurement

EPP

GUP

Mean difference test

Variance difference test

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Stat

df(s)

p

Cohen’s d

Stat

df(s)

p

Reaction time

All trials

Mean Go

659

172

560

116

7.54

372.13

< .001

0.7

36.1

1.539

< .001

Mean Nogo

586

219

470

161

6.56

369.35

< .001

0.62

23.5

1.507

< .001

SD Go

251

77

211

59

6.46

410.36

< .001

0.59

15.64

1.539

< .001

SD Nogo

238

183

142

128

6.2

324.23

< .001

0.62

40.37

1.439

< .001

Accuracy

All Trials

Go

0.95

0.07

0.97

0.05

− 4.45

387.75

< .001

− 0.41

42.1

1.539

< .001

Nogo

0.83

0.13

0.86

0.11

− 3.3

426.81

.001

− 0.3

14.1

1.539

< .001

ES MW probes

Attention Off

0.09

0.14

0.25

0.23

− 10.06

519.01

< .001

− 0.81

72.1

1.539

< .001

Meta-Awareness Off

0.36

0.36

0.26

0.28

2.81

238.1

.005

0.31

17.43

1.426

< .001

  1. Samples sizes were n \(=\) 228 and n \(=\) 313 for the EPP and GUP sample, respectively. For brevity, we only report parametric tests here even though several of the variables show a non-normal distribution. Non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U tests instead of t tests for mean differences and Brown–Forsythe tests instead of the Levene’s tests for variance differences) showed a similar overall pattern of results, see Table S8 in the supplementary materials at https://osf.io/8kg6z). SD \(=\) standard deviation, EPP \(=\) English-speaking paid participants, GUP \(=\) German-speaking unpaid participants.