Table 4 Reliabilities for MAAS, SART, and ES measures in both samples.

From: On the relationship between mind wandering and mindfulness

Measurement

GUP

EPP

Reliability\(^\text {a}\)

n

Reliability\(^\text {a}\)

n

Estimate

95% CI

Estimate

95% CI

 

Lower

Upper

 

Lower

Upper

MAAS

MAAS total\(^\text {b}\)

0.88

  

313

0.96

  

228

MAAS-5

0.92

  

313

0.93

  

228

MAAS-3

0.84

  

313

0.91

  

228

SART

Reaction time

All trials

Mean Go

0.98

0.98

0.99

313

0.99

0.99

0.99

228

Mean Nogo

0.58

0.46

0.69

150

0.59

0.49

0.69

134

SD Go

0.89

0.87

0.91

313

0.94

0.92

0.95

228

SD Nogo

0.31

0.09

0.46

150

0.31

0.12

0.46

134

10 s Window

Mean Go

0.98

0.97

0.98

313

0.98

0.97

0.99

96

Mean Nogo

0.33

− 0.22

0.82

13

0.36

− 0.07

0.79

9

SD Go

0.82

0.79

0.85

313

0.88

0.84

0.91

96

SD Nogo

0.26

− 0.56

0.90

13

0.24

− 0.31

0.89

9

Accuracy

All Trials

Go

0.95

0.94

0.97

313

0.96

0.95

0.97

228

Nogo

0.65

0.58

0.70

313

0.71

0.65

0.76

228

10 s Window

Go

0.89

0.85

0.92

313

0.89

0.85

0.93

96

Nogo

0.54

0.40

0.66

137

0.36

0.11

0.56

53

ES MW Probes

Attention Off

0.91

0.90

0.93

313

0.89

0.86

0.92

228

Meta-Awareness Off

0.74

0.68

0.79

182

0.80

0.72

0.87

47

  1. \(^\text {a}\)Reliability estimates are Cronbach’s alphas in case of MAAS scores and split-half reliabilites for SART and ES measures. Split-half estimates are Spearman-Brown corrected and were derived using a permutation-based approach with 5000 random splits57. \(^\text {b}\)MAAS total score included all 15 items in EPP, but only 14 items (excluding item 6) in the GUP. 95% CI \(=\) 95% confidence interval, SD \(=\) standard deviation.
Back to article page