Table 1 Review of some of the key national-level WFE Nexus conceptual frameworks.
Analytical frameworks | Developer | Advantages over the model of this research | Weaknesses compared to the model of this research | References |
---|---|---|---|---|
WFE Nexus Rapid Appraisal Tool | FAO | Capacity to quickly assess the WFE Nexus status with a limited number of indicators; Consideration of climate change | not being able to build scenarios | Flammini et al.45 |
MuSIASEM (Multi-Scale Integrated Analysis of Societal and Ecosystem Metabolism) | Giampietro et al. | considering economic and social issues. | Model complexity and lack of user-friendly graphical interface | Giampietro et al.46 |
World Bank Climate and Disaster Risk Screening Tools | World Bank | Considering climate trends and geophysical hazards | Having Diagnostic properties and not being able to build scenarios | Dargin et al.17 |
WEF Nexus Tool 2.0 | Daher and Mohtar | Considering carbon emissions | Ignoring temporal WFE nexus feedbacks; Ignoring aquatic environmental impact | |
National Outlook Model for Australia | CSIRO | Consideration of socio-economic issues, climate change and land use change | Geographically limited to Australia; imposing significant computational and input data requirements | Hatfield-Dodds et al.49 |