Figure 8

Performance comparison between methods considering the estimated anisotropy ratio \(\alpha ^2\). (a) Convergence of the with iteration number. (b) Sensitivity to measurement noise. (c) Robustness in front of needle angle misalignments.
Performance comparison between methods considering the estimated anisotropy ratio \(\alpha ^2\). (a) Convergence of the with iteration number. (b) Sensitivity to measurement noise. (c) Robustness in front of needle angle misalignments.