Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-10750-7, published online 04 May 2022


The original version of this Article contained an error in the Abstract.


“If confirmed in larger series, this finding could constitute a valuable tool for improving the interpretation of radiological.”


now reads:


“If confirmed in larger series, this finding could constitute a valuable tool for improving the interpretation of radiological patterns.”


The original Article has been corrected.