Table 2 Quantitative characters studied from nine parents and their crosses.

From: Combining ability and gene action for yield improvement in kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under tropical conditions through diallel mating design

Quantitative trait

Abbreviation (unit)

Description of evaluation method

Plant height

PH (cm)

Plant height was measured from the base to the tip of the main shoot of 10 randomly selected plants in meter scale at the time of harvest (pre-bud stage, 90 DAS)

Base diameter

BD (mm)

Average base diameter of 10 randomly selected plants was measured at the base of the stem in mm using slide calipers

Core diameter

CD (mm)

It was measured at the base point of the stem using slide calipers after the fiber separated from the stem. It was taken at the end of retting period

Middle diameter

MD (mm)

It was measured at the mid-point between base and top of the stem using slide calipers. It was also taken at the time of harvest

Top diameter

TD (mm)

It was measured at the top of the stem using slide calipers. It was also taken at the time of harvest

Number of nodes

NN

Number of nodes of 10 randomly selected plants was counted and averaged then for getting node no/plant

Days to first flowering

DTFF (days)

It was recorded as the number of days from the date of sowing to beginning of flowering in the population of each genotype

Days to 50% flowering

D50%F (days)

The number of days to flowering was quantified from planting date to the day when 50% flowering in the population of each genotype

Fresh stem weight with leaves and pods

FW1 (g)

Average fresh stem weight with leaves and pods of 10 plants was recorded using electric balance just after harvest and then per plant basis weight was calculated

Fresh stem weight without leaves and pods

FW2 (g)

Fresh stem weight of 10 randomly selected plants without leaves and pods was taken using electric balance just after harvest and then per plant basis weight was calculated

Dry stick weight

DSW (g)

It was measured from 10 previously selected plants after extraction of fiber and proper sun drying of the stick and the mean was computed

Dry fiber weight

DFW (g)

Dry fiber weight of randomly selected 10 plants from each plot was taken after retting and proper drying in the sun. Finally, per plant basis weight was calculated

Number of pods per plant

NF

Number of total pods from first to last pod setting per plant was counted in the field and recorded

Number of seeds per pod

NS

Number of matured seeds from 30 randomly selected pods per replication was counted and it was then averaged and replication wise recorded

1000 seeds weight

SW (g)

Weight of 1000 dry seeds (10% moisture) of each genotype for each replication was measured using digital balance and recorded