Table 3 Pearson correlations between rhythm discrimination, melody discrimination, reading ability, working memory for syllables (forward and backward), and epi- and metalinguistic phonological awareness, after removing the effects of cognitive ability (partial correlations).

From: Rhythm but not melody processing helps reading via phonological awareness and phonological memory

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1. Rhythm Discrimination

      

2. Melodic Discrimination

.41***

81.24

     

3. Reading Ability

.30**

4.11

.19

0.53

    

4. Working Memory Syllables Forward

.31**

5.24

.23

0.91

.58***

 > 100

   

5. Working Memory Syllables Backward

.21

0.72

.31**

5.08

.47***

 > 100

.36**

15.65

  

6. Epilinguistic Phonological Awareness

.33**

7.91

.25*

1.39

.55***

 > 100

.49***

 > 100

.49***

 > 100

 

7. Metalinguistic Phonological Awareness

.33**

7.76

.20

0.60

.69***

 > 100

.47***

 > 100

.45***

 > 100

.56***

 > 100

  1. N = 74 for all analyses, except for those involving Working Memory of Syllables, where n = 73 due to a missing value. BF10 values are indicated in italics. *p < .05; **p < .01; ***p < .001.