Table 4 Interactions between effects of MeDi food type (beneficial, detrimental) and rsFC on fluid reasoning performance.

From: Diet moderates the effect of resting state functional connectivity on cognitive function

Network

rsFC * Beneficial

rsFC * Detrimental

B [LL, UL]

p

B [LL, UL]

p

All

0.028 [− 0.427, 0.484]

0.903

0.337 [− 0.224, 0.898]

0.239

Hand

0.025 [− 0.356, 0.407]

0.898

0.257 [− 0.200, 0.714]

0.271

Vis

0.037 [− 0.359, 0.433]

0.855

0.345 [− 0.103, 0.793]

0.132

Mouth

− 0.095 [− 0.453, 0.262]

0.601

0.058 [− 0.390, 0.506]

0.799

Aud

0.072 [− 0.344, 0.488]

0.735

0.511 [− 0.052, 1.075]

0.075†

DMN

0.015 [− 0.394, 0.424]

0.944

0.211 [− 0.303, 0.725]

0.421

FP

− 0.022 [− 0.463, 0.419]

0.922

0.205 [− 0.342, 0.752]

0.463

VAN

0.128 [− 0.291, 0.546]

0.549

0.347 [− 0.184, 0.878]

0.200

CO

− 0.023 [− 0.459, 0.413]

0.918

0.311 [− 0.232, 0.855]

0.261

DAN

0.070 [− 0.333, 0.474]

0.732

0.164 [− 0.312, 0.639]

0.500

Sal

0.042 [− 0.397, 0.481]

0.850

0.416 [− 0.172, 1.005]

0.166

  1. B = unstandardized regression coefficient, with 95% Wald confidence intervals [LL: limit, UL: upper limit].
  2. All overall inter-network rsFC, Vis Visual, Aud Auditory, DMN default mode network, FP fronto-parietal, VAN ventral attention network, CO cingulo-opercular, DAN dorsal attention network, Sal salience.
  3. †p < .10.
Back to article page