Table 4 ITS1 and ITS2 hierarchical AMOVA results for E. baeticum, E. bastetanum, E. fitzii, E.lagascae, E. mediohispanicum, E. nevadense, and E. popovii.

From: Lack of ITS sequence homogenization in Erysimum species (Brassicaceae) with different ploidy levels

Species

Source of variation

ITS1

ITS2

df

Variance (sigma2)

Variance (%)

Φ

p

df

Variance (sigma2)

Variance (%)

Φ

p

E. baeticum

Populations

2

1.48 × 10–5

8.93

0.11

0.09

2

1.38 × 10–7

0.3

0.01

0.46

Individuals within populations

12

0

0

0

0.99

12

0

0

0

0.99

Within individuals

24

1.51 × 10–4

91.06

2

4.46 × 10–5

99.69

E. bastetanum

Populations

2

0

0

0

0.96

2

8.05 × 10–5

70.87

0.75

 < 0.01

Individuals within populations

12

0

0

0

0.61

10

0

0

0.69

0.99

Within individuals

31

2.33 × 10–4

100

29

3.30 × 10–5

29.12

E. fitzii

Individuals within populations

4

8.37 × 10–5

55.03

0

0.14

3

0

0

0

0.9

Within individuals

4

6.48 × 10–5

44.96

5

6.08 × 10–5

100

E. lagascae

Individuals within populations

4

6.50 × 10–8

0.07

0

0.55

4

0

0

0

0.94

Within individuals

2

8.48 × 10–5

99.92

4

0.06

100

E. mediohispanicum

Populations

2

4.58 × 10–5

48.07

0.5

 < 0.01

2

0

0

0

0.97

Individuals within populations

12

0

0

0.45

0.69

12

0

0

0

0.28

Within individuals

42

4.95 × 10–5

51.92

10

5.08 × 10–5

100

E. nevadense

Populations

2

1.67 × 10–5

18.29

0.25

 < 0.01

2

0

0

0

0.99

Individuals within populations

11

0

0

0

0.8

11

0

0

0

0.88

Within individuals

7

7.47 × 10–5

81.7

3

5.12 × 10–5

100

E. popovii

Populations

2

3.13 × 10–5

19.01

0.2

0.02

2

1.15 × 10–3

7.73

0.09

0.56

Individuals within populations

12

0

0

0.13

0.72

12

0

0

0

0.41

Within individuals

20

1.33 × 10–4

80.98

12

0.01

92.26