Table 2 Optimized and non-optimized sampling schedules for both multi-exponential models.
Bi-exponential | ||
|---|---|---|
K | CRLB | MCRLB |
4 | [0.5 4.7 22 55] | [0.5 3 20 55] |
5 | [0.5 4.7 23 55 55] | [0.5 2.1 6 22 55] |
6 | [0.5 5 24 24 55 55] | [0.5 2.2 6 21 22 55] |
7 | [0.5 5 24 25 55 55 55] | [0.5 2.1 6 23 23 55 55] |
8 | [0.5 5 25 25 25 55 55 55] | [0.5 1.7 5 6 22 22 55 55] |
9 | [0.5 4.4 7 24 24 24 55 55 55] | [0.5 1.8 6 6 22 22 22 55 55] |
10 | [0.5 4.4 7 24 25 25 55 55 55 55] | [0.5 1.8 6 6 23 23 23 55 55 55] |
11 | [0.5 4.6 7 24 24 25 25 55 55 55 55] | [0.5 1.8 6 6 22 23 23 23 55 55 55] |
12 | [0.5 4.6 7 25 25 25 25 55 55 55 55 55] | [0.5 1.8 6 6 23 23 23 23 55 55 55 55] |
Non-optimized | ||
4 | [0.5 18 37 55] | |
5 | [0.5 14 28 41 55] | |
6 | [0.5 11 22 33 44 55] | |
7 | [0.5 9 18 28 37 46 55] | |
8 | [0.5 8 16 24 31 39 47 55] | |
9 | [0.5 7 14 21 28 34 41 48 55] | |
10 | [0.5 6 12 18 24 31 37 43 49 55] | |
11 | [0.5 6 11 17 22 28 33 39 44 50 55] | |
12 | [0.5 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55] | |
Stretched-exponential | ||
CRLB | MCRLB | |
3 | [0.5 11 55] | [0.5 11 55] |
4 | [0.5 10 16 55] | [0.5 12 14 55] |
5 | [0.5 12 13 55 55] | [0.5 12 13 55 55] |
6 | [0.5 0.5 9 17 55 55] | [0.5 0.5 11 11 55 55] |
7 | [0.5 0.5 11 11 55 55 55] | [0.5 0.5 12 12 12 55 55] |
8 | [0.5 0.5 9 10 30 55 55 55] | [0.5 0.5 12 12 12 55 55 55] |
9 | [0.5 0.5 12 12 12 55 55 55 55] | [0.5 0.5 0.5 11 11 12 55 55 55] |
Non-optimized | ||
3 | [0.5 28 55] | |
4 | [0.5 19 37 55] | |
5 | [0.5 14 28 42 55] | |
6 | [0.5 12 23 33 44 55] | |
7 | [0.5 10 19 28 37 46 55] | |
8 | [0.5 9 16 24 32 40 47 55] | |
9 | [0.5 8 14 21 28 35 42 48 55] | |
