Table 2 p values for the statistically significant differences between the techniques (values not statistically significant in bold).

From: 3D measurement techniques for the hindfoot alignment angle from weight-bearing CT in a clinical population

 

A

B1

B2

C

D10

D15

D20

E

Clinical

Render

PRE

A

          

B1

0.0000

         

B2

0.0082

0.0000

        

C

0.0014

0.0033

0.0687

       

D10

0.0001

0.0718

0.0007

0.0024

      

D15

0.0000

0.0001

0.0000

0.0000

0.1067

     

D20

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.1841

0.9008

    

E

0.0000

0.0001

0.0000

0.0000

0.236

0.9059

0.7615

   

Clinical

0.0000

0.0016

0.0000

0.0000

0.6536

0.0274

0.0148

0.0318

  

Render

0.0000

0.0043

0.0000

0.0000

0.6581

0.0012

0.0001

0.0004

0.0008

 

POST

A

          

B1

0.0000

         

B2

0.0002

0.0000

        

C

0.0116

0.0001

0.1626

       

D10

0.035

0.0407

0.6917

0.7322

      

D15

0.0001

0.7239

0.0172

0.0014

0.0022

     

D20

0.0000

0.2104

0.0035

0.0002

0.004

0.0686

    

E

0.0000

0.4526

0.0151

0.0023

0.0091

0.5366

0.4609

   

Clinical

0.0000

0.0431

0.0008

0.0000

0.0025

0.0233

0.0248

0.0639

  

Render

0.0000

0.242

0.0008

0.0001

0.0159

0.6658

0.3257

0.8492

0.0068

 
Back to article page