Table 5 Comparative results with the SOTA methods on parameters and time–cost on the 3DIRCADb dataset.
Model | Dimension | Parameters | Training time | Test time |
---|---|---|---|---|
Christ et al.3 | 2D | 19,643,746 | 3Â h 23Â min 18Â s | 158.11Â s |
Chlebus et al.30 | 2D | 7,765,442 | 2Â h 45Â min 33Â s | 139.85Â s |
Han et al.6 | 2D | 3,858,420 | 2Â h 11Â min 04Â s | 114.22Â s |
Seo et al.13 | 2D | 4,086,690 | 3Â h 31Â min 12Â s | 137.47Â s |
Li et al.11 | 3D | 2,059,346,00 | 42Â h 51Â min 45Â s | 45.51Â s |
Proposed | 3D | 6,422,037 | 34Â h 01Â min 50Â s | 15.19Â s |
Proposed + CRF | – | – | 34 h 01 min 50 s | 2 min 15 s |