Table 2 Regression analysis results.

From: The inverted U-shaped relationship between knowledge diversity of researchers and societal impact

Variables

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

M

SE

M

SE

M

SE

Control variables

Institution count

0.013**

0.005

0.006

0.007

0.012*

0.007

Author count

0.005*

0.003

0.006**

0.003

0.004*

0.002

Journal

− 0.207***

0.072

− 0.214***

0.071

− 0.216***

0.071

Time lag

0.0003

0.0003

0.0003

0.0003

0.0003

0.0003

Fields_Physical sciences and engineering

− 0.584***

0.126

− 0.578***

0.124

− 0.583***

0.124

Fields_Life and earth sciences

0.678***

0.091

0.655***

0.090

0.634**

0.089

Fields_Biomedical and health sciences

0.388***

0.111

0.353***

0.109

0.346***

0.108

Fields_Social sciences and humanities

0.836***

0.146

0.838***

0.146

0.822***

0.146

Fields_Mathematics and computer science

0.862***

0.323

0.843***

0.323

0.833***

0.322

Independent variables

Subject count

  

0.029

0.019

0.099***

0.031

Subject count2

    

− 0.006***

0.002

Constant

4.187***

0.483

4.131***

0.481

3.958***

0.477

Wald chi2

267.85***

283.70***

295.44***

AIC/BIC

18,420.86/18,479.58

18,418.83/18,482.89

18,410.12/18,479.52

Pseudo R2

0.024

0.024

0.025

Alpha 95%CI

[0.941, 1.086]

[0.939, 1.084]

[0.934, 1.078]

  1. ***p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, * p < 0.1; Number of observations = 1539.