Table 3 Confirmatory factor analysis of the factor models of previous studies with the second set of PBI data (n = 2330).
From: Factor structure of the parental bonding instrument for pregnant Japanese women
Study | Year | Country | No. of factors | Factors | Items | Paternal form | Maternal form | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFI | RMSEA | CFI | RMSEA | ||||||
Kitamura et al. | 1993 | Japan | 2 | Care | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 14, 16, 17, 18, 24 | 0.844 | 0.082 | 0.834 | 0.089 |
Over-protection | 3, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25 | ||||||||
Uji et al. | 2006 | Japan | 4 | Care | 1, 5, 6, 11, 12, 17 | 0.879 | 0.073 | 0.890 | 0.073 |
Indifference | 2, 4, 14, 16, 18, 24 | ||||||||
Over-protection | 8, 9, 10, 13, 19, 20, 23 | ||||||||
Autonomy | 3, 7, 15, 21, 22, 25 | ||||||||
Sato et al. | 2021 | Japan | 3 | Care | 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 16, 17, 18, 24 | 0.900 | 0.070 | 0.906 | 0.072 |
Current study | 2022 | Japan | 3 | Interference | 8, 9, 10, 13, 19, 20 | ||||
Autonomy | 3, 15, 21, 22, 25 |