Table 2 Regression between ionic contents (Na+ and K+) in shoot and root of guava plant (Psidium Guajava L.), and stress tolerance against salinity and water stress treatments.

From: Interactive salinity and water stress severely reduced the growth, stress tolerance, and physiological responses of guava (Psidium Guajava L.)

Parameters

Regression

Coefficient of correlation (R)

Adjusted regression coefficient (Adj.R2)

Significance

K+/Na+ (shoot) vs. shoot dry weight

y = 47.20−exp(−1.31x)

0.990

0.980

****

K+/Na+ (root) vs. root dry weight

y = 1.911x + 3.000

0.865

0.732

****

K+/Na+ vs. chlorophyll content (leaf)

y = 5.105x + 12.26

0.836

0.825

****

K+/Na+ vs. chlorophyll content (stem)

y = 3.533x + 10.93

0.923

0.842

****

K+/Na+ vs. chlorophyll content (root)

y = 2.735x + 8.931

0.964

0.925

****

K+/Na+ vs. photosynthetic rate (leaf)

y = 1.940x + 3.063

0.938

0.872

****

K+/Na+ vs. photosynthetic rate (stem)

y = 1.401x + 2.454

0.985

0.968

****

K+/Na+ vs. photosynthetic rate (root)

y = 1.014x + 1.874

0.964

0.925

****

K+/Na+ vs. transpiration rate (leaf)

y = 0.316x + 0.924

0.861

0.724

****

K+/Na+ vs. transpiration rate (stem)

y = 0.238x + 0.808

0.936

0.868

****

K+/Na+ vs. transpiration rate (root)

y = 0.173x + 0.708

0.914

0.826

****

K+/Na+ vs. stomatal conductance (leaf)

y = 0.170x + 0.032

0.991

0.981

****

K+/Na+ vs. stomatal conductance (stem)

y = 0.118x–0.012

0.992

0.980

****

K+/Na+ vs. stomatal conductance (root)

y = 0.086x–0.065

0.986

0.970

****

  1. Na+ and K+ denote sodium and potassium, respectively. Results are significant at p ≤ 0.0001 represented by ****y. All regressions are based on first order kinetics equation (y = bx + a) where “a” is the intercept, and “b” is the slope value for the regression except regression between K+/Na+ (shoot) and shoot dry weight is based on exponential model (y = a−exp(bx)).