Table 2 Regression between ionic contents (Na+ and K+) in shoot and root of guava plant (Psidium Guajava L.), and stress tolerance against salinity and water stress treatments.
Parameters | Regression | Coefficient of correlation (R) | Adjusted regression coefficient (Adj.R2) | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
K+/Na+ (shoot) vs. shoot dry weight | y = 47.20−exp(−1.31x) | 0.990 | 0.980 | **** |
K+/Na+ (root) vs. root dry weight | y = 1.911x + 3.000 | 0.865 | 0.732 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. chlorophyll content (leaf) | y = 5.105x + 12.26 | 0.836 | 0.825 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. chlorophyll content (stem) | y = 3.533x + 10.93 | 0.923 | 0.842 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. chlorophyll content (root) | y = 2.735x + 8.931 | 0.964 | 0.925 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. photosynthetic rate (leaf) | y = 1.940x + 3.063 | 0.938 | 0.872 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. photosynthetic rate (stem) | y = 1.401x + 2.454 | 0.985 | 0.968 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. photosynthetic rate (root) | y = 1.014x + 1.874 | 0.964 | 0.925 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. transpiration rate (leaf) | y = 0.316x + 0.924 | 0.861 | 0.724 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. transpiration rate (stem) | y = 0.238x + 0.808 | 0.936 | 0.868 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. transpiration rate (root) | y = 0.173x + 0.708 | 0.914 | 0.826 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. stomatal conductance (leaf) | y = 0.170x + 0.032 | 0.991 | 0.981 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. stomatal conductance (stem) | y = 0.118x–0.012 | 0.992 | 0.980 | **** |
K+/Na+ vs. stomatal conductance (root) | y = 0.086x–0.065 | 0.986 | 0.970 | **** |