Table 1 The average performance metrics with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the stepwise transfer learning and other methods on the fivefold cross-validation for predicting cases of refractory central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

From: DeepPDT-Net: predicting the outcome of photodynamic therapy for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy using two-stage multimodal transfer learning

 

AUC

(95% CI)

Accuracy (%)

(95% CI)

Sensitivity (%)

(95% CI)

Specificity (%)

(95% CI)

P value*

Stepwise transfer learning

ResNet50

0.839 (0.770‒0.895)

83.0 (75.9‒88.7)

67.7 (48.6‒83.3)

87.1 (79.6‒92.6)

Ref.

VGG16

0.827 (0.756‒0.884)

83.7 (76.7‒89.3)

64.5 (45.4‒80.8)

88.8 (81.6‒93.9)

0.539

Traditional transfer learning

ResNet50

0.808 (0.735‒0.868)

81.0 (73.7‒87.0)

64.5 (45.4‒80.8)

85.3 (77.6‒91.2)

0.223

VGG16

0.800 (0.726‒0.861)

80.3 (72.9‒86.4)

61.3 (42.2‒78.2)

85.3 (77.6‒91.2)

0.198

Xception

0.816 (0.744‒0.875)

81.6 (74.4‒87.5)

64.5 (45.4‒80.8)

86.2 (78.6‒91.9)

0.337

EfficientNet-b0

0.796 (0.722‒0.858)

82.3 (75.2‒88.1)

58.1 (39.1‒75.5)

88.8 (81.6‒93.9)

0.149

Other architecture

NASNet-Large

0.582 (0.498‒0.663)

44.2 (36.0‒52.6)

87.1 (70.2‒96.4)

32.8 (24.3‒42.1)

0.002

  1. *The AUCs were compared using the DeLong's method.