Table 2 Effect of ΔPes and ΔPL on associations between pendelluft20-25 frequencies and biomarker ratios.
Predictor | Estimate | R2 | t-value | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1: IL-8 ratio = β0 + β1*pend20 + β2*ΔPes | ||||
pendelluft-20 | 1.485 | 0.085 | 1.398 | 0.177 |
ΔPes | 0.018 | 0.494 | 0.626 | |
Model 2: IL-8 ratio = β0 + β1*pend20 + β2*ΔPL | ||||
pendelluft-20 | 1.324 | 0.075 | 1.286 | 0.212 |
ΔPL | 0.002 | 0.056 | 0.956 | |
Model 3: IL-8 ratio = β0 + β1*pend25 + β2*ΔPes | ||||
pendelluft-25 | 4.631 | 0.228 | 2.492 | 0.021 |
ΔPes | 0.037 | 1.079 | 0.292 | |
Model 4: IL-8 ratio = β0 + β1*pend25 + β2*ΔPL | ||||
pendelluft-25 | 3.942 | 0.188 | 2.200 | 0.039 |
ΔPL | − 0.011 | − 0.266 | 0.793 | |
Model 5: IL-18 ratio = β0 + β1*pend20 + β2*ΔPes | ||||
pendelluft-20 | 0.553 | 0.169 | 1.949 | 0.065 |
ΔPes | − 0.001 | − 0.083 | 0.934 | |
Model 6: IL-18 ratio = β0 + β1*pend20 + β2*ΔPL | ||||
pendelluft-20 | 0.558 | 0.169 | 2.038 | 0.054 |
ΔPL | 0.001 | 0.086 | 0.932 | |
Model 7: IL-18 ratio = β0 + β1*pend25 + β2*ΔPes | ||||
pendelluft-25 | 1.577 | 0.355 | 3.309 | 0.003 |
ΔPes | 0.005 | 0.601 | 0.554 | |
Model 8: IL-18 ratio = β0 + β1*pend25 + β2*ΔPL | ||||
pendelluft-25 | 1.500 | 0.348 | 3.327 | 0.003 |
ΔPL | − 0.037 | − 0.370 | 0.715 | |
Model 9: Caspase-1 ratio = β0 + β1*pend20 + β2*ΔPes | ||||
pendelluft-20 | 1.025 | 0.235 | 1.856 | 0.078 |
ΔPes | − 0.021 | − 1.112 | 0.279 | |
Model 10: Caspase-1 ratio = β0 + β1*pend20 + β2*ΔPL | ||||
pendelluft-20 | 1.141 | 0.225 | 2.131 | 0.045 |
ΔPL | 0.021 | 0.978 | 0.339 | |
Model 11: Caspase-1 ratio = β0 + β1*pend25 + β2*ΔPes | ||||
pendelluft-25 | 2.611 | 0.336 | 2.659 | 0.001 |
ΔPes | − 0.012 | − 0.646 | 0.525 | |
Model 12: Caspase-18 ratio = β0 + β1*pend25 + β2*ΔPL | ||||
pendelluft-25 | 2.728 | 0.334 | 2.952 | 0.008 |
ΔPL | 0.012 | 0.654 | 0.520 |