Table 5 Synthetic view of advantages and limitations of some identification methodologies for medically important arthropods.

From: Wing Interferential Patterns (WIPs) and machine learning, a step toward automatized tsetse (Glossina spp.) identification

Methods

Conservation procedure for identification

Technical cost*

Computational cost

Effort

Sample destruction

Precision (Sp/Ssp)

Available for Glossina spp

DNA Barcoding

−20 °C

High

Low

High

Yes

Ssp

No

Protein profiling

4 °C at best

High

Low

Low

Yes/part

Sp

3 Glossina sp

Dichotomous keys

RT

High

High

High

No/yes$

Ssp

Yes

WIPs (supervised)

RT

Low

None

Low

No

Ssp

Yes

WIPs + Deep Learning (ours)

RT

Low

Medium

Medium

No

Ssp

Yes

  1. *The technical cost includes sample preparation (DNA, protein extraction, slides, etc.) and expenses linked to the need for a skilled professional. $ Samples destruction can be necessary for some species of medically important insects like Psychodidae, sp species, Ssp subspecies.