Table 1 Scientific papers considered in the meta-analysis.

From: The debate on the earthquake magnitude correlations: a meta-analysis

Number

Year

Reference

Data

Method

Correlations

Author

1

1989

6

Numerical

Heuristic

No

Bak & Tang

2

2002

26

SCSN

Statistics

No

Christensen et al.

3

2004

27

CMT,NEIC,CNSS

Statistics

No

Felzer et al.

4

2004

7

SCSN

Heuristic

Yes

Yang et al.

5

2005

28

SCSN

Heuristic

No

Corral

6

2006

29

ANSS

Statistics

No

Helmstetter et al.

7

2006

30

NEIC-PDE

Statistics

No

Corral

8

2007

24

ANSS

Statistics

Yes

Lippiello et al.

9

2007

25

ANSS

Statistics

Yes

Lippiello et al.

10

2007

31

NCEDC

Physics

No

Caruso et al.

11

2008

22

NCEDC

Statistics

Yes

Lippiello et al.

12

2009

32

SCEC,JMAEC

Statistics

Yes

Sarlis et al.

13

2009

33

NCEDC

Statistics

Yes

Lippiello et al.

14

2010

34

CMT

Statistics

No

Yoder et al.

15

2010

35

CMT

Statistics

No

Aalsburg et al.

16

2011

36

Numerical

Physics

No

Zhang et al.

17

2011

37

SCEC, CMT

Statistics

Yes

Sarlis

18

2011

21

38

Statistics

No

Davidsen

19

2012

39

40

Statistics

Yes

Lippiello et al.

20

2012

41

42

Statistics

No

Davidsen et al.

21

2013

23

Numerical

Physics

Yes

Lippiello et al.

22

2013

43

CMT

Statistics

Yes

Nichols et al.

23

2013

44

Numerical

Physics

No

Shcherbakov et al.

24

2016

45

ISIDE,46

Statistics

Yes

Spassiani et al.

25

2016

47

Numerical

Statistics

Yes

Spassiani et al.

26

2018

48

TABOO,SOCAL,JMA

Statistics

No

Stallone et al.

27

2019

49

SCSN

Statistics

No

Zambrano

28

2019

50

CMT

Statistics

Yes

Nandan et al.

29

2022

51

ANSS

Statistics

Yes

Nandan et al.