Table 3 Relationship between social mindfulness and more complex forms of cooperative attitudes and outcomes.

From: Social mindfulness predicts concern for nature and immigrants across 36 nations

Variables

Within-countries

Between-countries

β

SE

p

β

SE

p

Individual level

Moral expansiveness

0.07

0.01

< .001***

− 0.02

0.16

.898

Moral expansiveness for nature

0.05

0.01

< .001***

− 0.15

0.16

.351

Negative attitudes towards immigrants

− 0.10

0.01

< .001***

− 0.58

0.13

< .001***

Schwartz universalism

0.03

0.01

.019*

− 0.07

0.16

.680

Anomie

− 0.03

0.01

.017*

− 0.21

0.15

.180

Anomie in the social fabric

− 0.03

0.01

.010*

− 0.33

0.15

.034*

Anomie in leadership

− 0.02

0.01

.112

− 0.11

0.16

.488

Schwartz benevolence

0.05

0.01

< .001***

− 0.04

0.16

.819

Country level

Environmental care

–

–

–

0.41

0.15

.010*

Tolerance for minorities as neighbors

–

–

–

0.58

0.15

< .001***

Child quality: tolerance/respect

–

–

–

0.29

0.17

.101

Trust

–

–

–

0.33

0.16

.049*

Social capital index

–

–

–

0.58

0.13

< .001***

Collective action

–

–

–

0.47

0.16

.008*

Citizenship index

–

–

–

0.42

0.15

.008*

Voice and accountability of people

–

–

–

0.48

0.14

.002**

Child quality: unselfishness

–

–

–

0.14

0.18

.437

  1. *p < .05, **p < .003^, ***p < .001.
  2. Each variable was analyzed in a separate Linear Mixed Model with age, gender, economic conservatism, and social conservatism included as controls.
  3. ^Bonferroni corrected alpha cut-off.
Back to article page