Table 4 Results of statistical analysis for the effect of injection of risedronate on the lick ratio in mice (Fig. 4).
Figure | Content | Analysis | P value | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
4A | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) × Concentration [HCl] | Two-way ANOVA | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) | F (1,171) = 37.210 | < 0.001 |
Concentration | F (4,171) = 375.920 | < 0.001 | |||
Injection × Concentration | F (4,171) = 5.340 | < 0.001 | |||
Student's t-test | Ctrl vs Rise | 1 mmol/L HCl | 0.472 | ||
3 mmol/L HCl | < 0.001 | ||||
5 mmol/L HCl | < 0.01 | ||||
10 mmol/L HCl | < 0.05 | ||||
30 mmol/L HCl | 0.211 | ||||
4B | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) × Concentration [NaCl] | Two-way ANOVA | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) | F (1,204) = 0.009 | 0.922 |
Concentration | F (5,204) = 154.157 | < 0.001 | |||
Injection × Concentration | F (5,204) = 0.878 | 0.496 | |||
4C | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) × Concentration [KCl] | Two-way ANOVA | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) | F (1,66) = 0.001 | 0.997 |
Concentration | F (2,66) = 227.363 | < 0.001 | |||
Injection × Concentration | F (2,66) = 1.364 | 0.262 | |||
4D | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) × Concentration [Suc] | Two-way ANOVA | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) | F (1,203) = 0.415 | 0.52 |
Concentration | F (5,203) = 255.785 | < 0.001 | |||
Injection × Concentration | F (5,203) = 0.791 | 0.557 | |||
4E | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) × Concentration [QHCl] | Two-way ANOVA | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) | F (1.96) = 3.623 | 0.060 |
Concentration | F (4.96) = 300.026 | < 0.001 | |||
Injection × Concentration | F (4.96) = 0.754 | 0.558 | |||
4F | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) × Concentration [MPG] | Two-way ANOVA | Injection (Ctrl vs Rise) | F (1.86) = 2.438 | 0.122 |
Concentration | F (3.86) = 163.876 | < 0.001 | |||
Injection × Concentration | F (3.86) = 0.686 | 0.563 |