Table 1 Summary of included studies (references are reported in the Supplementary Material).

From: Comparing CABG and PCI across the globe based on current regional registry evidence

Author

Year

Country/region

No of patients

Mean follow-up (y)

Population comparability

Endpoint long-term mortality

Hueb (MASS-II)

2010

Brazil

611

10

RCT

No difference

Zalweska-Adamiec

2013

Poland

257

1.3

Not adjusted

No difference

Chou

2014

Taiwan

1287

5.4

MR

Favors CABG

Sugumar

2014

Australia

8970

3.1

PSM

Favors CABG

Bangalore

2015

New York State, United States

34,819

2.9

PSM

No difference

Krishnaswami

2015

San Francisco Bay Area, United States

1015

5

MR

No difference

Nicolini

2015

Italy

1388

5.5 (CABG)

4.4 (PCI)

PSM

Favors CABG

Lautamäki

2016

Finland

268

2.1

PSM

Favors CABG

Mølstad

2016

Norway

22,880

8

MR

No difference

Yamaji

2016

Japan

5651

10.1 (CABG)

9.9 (PCI)

MR

Favors CABG

Zheng

2016

China

4046

3

PSM

Favors CABG

Nyström

2017

Sweden

2546

8

PSM

Favors CABG

Roberts

2017

North Carolina, United States

4687

5.1

PSM

Favors CABG

Iribarne

2018

New England, United States

73,730

4.3

PSM

Favors CABG

Merkle

2018

Germany

561

6

MR

Favors CABG

Milojevic

2018

Netherlands

1897

39 (CABG)

33 (PCI)

Not adjusted

Favors CABG

Nagendran

2018

Alberta, Canada

2837

5.5

PSM

Favors CABG

Ram

2018

Israel

1063

3

MR

Favors CABG

Shah

2018

Great Britain

717

5

PSM

Favors CABG

Khosravi

2019

Iran

173

0.5

Not adjusted

No difference

Lee

2020

South Korea

2240

10

PSM

Favors CABG

Tam

2020

Ontario, Canada

14,235

5.5

PSM

Favors CABG

Huckaby

2021

Pennsylvania, United States

1091

4 (CABG)

3.5 (PCI)

PSM

Favors CABG

  1. CABG coronary artery bypass grafting, MR multivariable regression, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, PSM propensity score matching, RCT randomized clinical trial.