Table 1 Bivariate correlations (r, ρ) between the US biomarkers and age, BMI, self-reported questionnaires, muscle strength and physical functional performance, stratified by gender.

From: Relationship between quadriceps femoris muscle architecture and muscle strength and physical function in older adults with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

 

Age

BMI

NYHA

Katz Index

Lawnton & Brody

5-STS

SPPB

TUG

6MWT

UGS

FGS

Men (n = 30)

Non-con MT

− .151

.450*

− .092

− .075

.305

.192

− .120

.379*

− .497*

− .297

− .152

Non-con MEI

− .348

− .268

.089

− .042

.131

.123

− .222

.082

− .008

− .183

.071

Non-con FT

.280

.393*

− .012

− .092

.122

− .243

.184

− .177

.102

.135

.207

Non-con FEI

.256

.095

.036

− .058

− .039

− .233

.136

− .310

.373*

.219

.204

Con MT

− .164

.511*

− .212

.055

.300

.090

− .040

.305

− .317

− .171

.039

Con MEI

− .181

− .484*

.167

− .072

− .129

.057

− .060

.008

− .022

− .124

.115

Con FT

.205

.432*

.076

− .217

.196

− .194

.143

− .141

.098

.144

.168

Con FEI

.196

.031

.140

− .156

− .160

− .072

.005

− .179

.195

.099

.031

MT Difference

− .061

.232

− .276

.261

.070

− .170

.140

− .066

.263

.196

.366*

MEI Difference

.240

− .219

.108

.098

− .459*

− .093

.218

− .098

− .015

.092

.043

FT Difference

− .513*

.051

.260

− .333

.288

.358

− .293

.258

− .061

− .005

− .288

FEI Difference

− .126

− .116

.220

− .183

− .130

.291

− .232

.250

− .335

− .223

− .308

Women (n = 40)

Non-con MT

− .291

.233

.395*

.202

− .037

.283

− .242

.190

− .147

− .113

− .226

Non-con MEI

.250

− .406*

.051

− .140

.104

− .160

.224

− .224

.074

.188

.175

Non-con FT

− .143

.494**

− .056

.218

− .280

.469*

− .555**

.539**

− .365*

− .503**

− .445*

Non-con FEI

.187

.122

− .323*

.112

− .266

.190

− .268

.244

− .288

− .354*

− .211

Con MT

− .314*

.210

.303

.130

.002

.316*

− .317*

.254

− .118

− .207

− .217

Con MEI

.364*

− .396*

.031

− .156

.219

− .302

.267

− .301

.215

.342*

.286

Con FT

− .138

.461*

− .046

.218

− .257

.479*

− .520**

.540**

− .341*

− .526**

− .409*

Con FEI

.181

.174

− .221

.115

− .196

.151

− .222

.230

− .193

− .233

− .127

MT Difference

− .005

− .073

− .187

.029

− .129

.025

− .107

.094

.072

− .160

.045

MEI Difference

.170

.044

− .126

− .054

.062

− .223

.055

− .112

.227

.240

.169

FT Difference

.035

− .186

− .041

− .075

− .078

− .014

.199

− .058

.134

− .035

.189

FEI Difference

− .070

.045

.245

.057

− .008

− .122

.158

− .101

.244

.307

.201

  1. US Ultrasound, BMI Body Mass Index, NYHA New York Heart Association class, 5-STS Five-Repetitions Sit-to Stand, SPPB Short Physical Performance Battery, TUG Timed Up and Go test, 6MWT 6 Minute Walking Test, UGS Usual Gait Speed, FGS Fast Gait Speed, Non-con MT Non-contraction Muscle Thickness, Non-con MEI Non-contraction Muscle Echo-Intensity, Non-con FT Non-contraction subcutaneous Fat tissue Thickness, Non-con FEI Non-contraction subcutaneous Fat tissue Echo-Intensity, Con MT Contraction Muscle Thickness, Con MEI Contraction Muscle Echo-Intensity, Con FT Contraction subcutaneous Fat tissue Thickness, Con FEI Contraction subcutaneous Fat tissue Echo-Intensity, MT Difference Difference between contraction and non-contraction Muscle Thickness, MEI Difference Difference between contraction and non-contraction Muscle Echo-Intensity, FT Difference Difference between contraction and non-contraction subcutaneous Fat tissue Thickness, FEI Difference Difference between contraction and non-contraction subcutaneous Fat tissue Echo-Intensity.
  2. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.001.