Table 2 Parity grade (PG) obtained between the diagnoses of the DRIS and CND methods adopting different range factors adopted in the nutrient responsiveness range (NRr) for the diagnosis of B in soybean, cultivated in Chapadão do Sul, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil.
From: Prescient diagnostic analysis for boron nutritional status in soy crops
Degree of agreement (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DrisAll | DrisFtest | DrisVar | DrisLog | CND | ||
DrisAll | 1.00 | – | ||||
0.50 | – | |||||
0.25 | – | |||||
DrisFtest | 1.00 | 93 | – | |||
0.50 | 81 | – | ||||
0.25 | 75 | – | ||||
DrisVar | 1.00 | 95 | 96 | – | ||
0.50 | 85 | 88 | – | |||
0.25 | 75 | 88 | – | |||
DrisLog | 1.00 | 85 | 84 | 83 | – | |
0.50 | 72 | 64 | 72 | – | ||
0.25 | 79 | 63 | 70 | – | ||
CND | 1.00 | 91 | 95 | 92 | 84 | – |
0.50 | 79 | 85 | 84 | 69 | – | |
0.25 | 79 | 84 | 91 | 68 | – | |
