Table 1 Comparing of the performance and cost of various LiDARs.
From: Development of the high angular resolution 360° LiDAR based on scanning MEMS mirror
LiDAR design | Company | Channel | Number of MEMS mirror | Weight (kg) | FoV (H × V) | Angular resolution (H × V) | Points per second | Refresh rate | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Puck | Velodyne | 16 | – | 1 | 360° × 30° | 0.1° × 2° | 600,000 | 5–20 Hz for 360\(^\circ\) | $8,000 |
HDL-64E | Velodyne | 64 | – | 12.7 | 360° × 27° | 0.08° × 0.4° | 2,200,000 | 5–20 Hz for 360\(^\circ\) | $75,000 |
VLS-128 | Velodyne | 128 | – | 5.3 | 360° × 40° | 0.1° × 0.11\(^\circ\) | 4,800,000 | 5–10 Hz for 360° | $53,000 |
Niclass et al.22 | Research work | 3 | 1 | – | 45° × 11° | 0.17° × 0.17° | 163,840 | 10 Hz | – |
Xu et al.23 | Research work | 1 | 3 | – | 60° × 10° | 0.2° × 0.59° | 97,223 | 19 Hz | – |
Lee et al.24 | Research work | 1 | 1 | – | 5.78° × 6.36° | 0.05°× 0.13° | 25,000 | 1 Hz | – |
Our LiDAR system | Research work | 1 | 1 | 2 | 360° × 8.6° | 0.07° × 0.027° | 6,300 | 0.004 Hz for 360° | $1700 |
