Table 3 Pairwise comparisons of the Bayesian standard ellipses area (SEAB) between the treatments testing effects of diatom and cyanobacteria addition to the control sediment for each basin (BP vs. BoS).

From: High capacity for a dietary specialist consumer population to cope with increasing cyanobacterial blooms

Treatment comparisons

Probability, BP

Difference in SEAB (%)

Probability, BoS

Difference in SEAB (%)

\(\mathrm{HD vs}.\mathrm{ HDLC}\)

0.52

− 2

1

− 70

\(\mathrm{LD vs}.\mathrm{ LDHC}\)

0.82

− 27

0.93

− 40

\(\mathrm{Control vs}.\mathrm{ HDLC}\)

0.61

− 10

0.99

− 60

\(\mathrm{Control vs}.\mathrm{ HD}\)

0.59

− 8

0.18

 + 34

\(\mathrm{Control vs}.\mathrm{ LDHC}\)

0.84

− 30

0.98

− 53

\(\mathrm{Control vs}.\mathrm{ LD}\)

0.54

− 4

0.22

− 22

\(\mathrm{Control vs}.\mathrm{ Initial}\)

0.99

32

1

21

  1. The probability of the different SEAB values (fold change, increase/decrease) was considered significant when > 0.95 (% Difference is shown in bold).
Back to article page