Table 1 Participants’ sociolinguistic data (means with 95% CI).

From: Native and non-native language contexts differently modulate mood-driven electrodermal activity

 

Polish (L1)

English (L2)

Proficiencya

n/a

86.68[84.88, 88.47]

Proficiencyb

97.37[95.95, 98.73]

87.77[85.95, 89.58]

Dominanceb

60.68[58.37, 62.99]

53.70[51.58, 55.82]

Immersionb

78.06[74.96, 81.17]

69.68[67.42, 71.94]

Listening skillsb

6.96[6.90, 7.02]

6.26[6.09, 6.42]

Speaking skillsb

6.74[6.61, 6.88]

5.96[5.78, 6.13]

Reading skillsb

6.89[6.79, 7.00]

6.36[6.21, 6.51]

Writing skillsb

6.68[6.48, 6.88]

5.98[5.78, 6.18]

Age of acquisitionb

n/a

6.34[5.84, 6.84]

  1. aLexTALE72 (percentages); bLanguage History Questionnaire 3.045 (as translated into Polish by Naranowicz & Witczak): the proficiency, dominance, and immersion scores (percentages); listening, speaking, reading, and writing skills (1—very low proficiency, 7—very high proficiency); age of acquisition (years).
Back to article page