Table 4 Univariable analyses of interactions between continuous TROP-2 expression and categorical clinical–pathological factors.

From: Correlation of TROP-2 expression with clinical–pathological characteristics and outcome in triple-negative breast cancer

Variable

Category

N

Median

TROP-2 expression H-score

IQR

TROP-2 expression H-score

p-value

AR expression (1% cutoff)

AR positive

187

80.8

(20.0–180.0)

0.070

AR negative

398

81.4

(10.0–150.0)

AR expression (10% cutoff)

AR positive

146

102.0

(20.0–180.0)

0.009

AR negative

439

55.0

(10.0–140.0)

Tumor size (TNM)

T1

266

81.0

(15.0–155.0)

0.598

T2

260

82.0

(10.0–155.0)

T3

40

87.2

(4.5–145.0)

T4

23

62.0

(20.0–120.0)

Nodal status

Node positive

376

80.0

(20.0–180.0)

0.016

Node negative

211

60.0

(10.0–149.0)

Nodal status (TNM)

N0

376

60.0

(10.0–149.0)

0.119

N1

155

75.0

(20.0–180.0)

N2

32

88.0

(27.5–160.0)

N3

24

95.0

(20.0–165.0)

Differentiation grade

1

7

120.0

(0.0–150.0)

0.479

2

60

100.0

(20.0–165.0)

2

522

60.0

(10.0–150.0)

Associated DCIS

Absent

221

40.0

(7.0–125.0)

 < 0.001

Present

368

82.5

(20.0–180.0)

LVI

Absent

359

70.0

(20.0–150.0)

0.006

Present

111

100.0

(30.0–200.0)

Histological subtype

IBC-NST

471

70.0

(12.0–150.0)

 < 0.001

Mixed

11

70.0

(20.0–150.0)

Apocrine

26

180.0

(110.0–200.0)

BCmedullary

34

40.5

(7.0–150.0)

Metaplastic

27

45.0

(10.0–100.0)

Other

20

15.0

(0.0–95.0)

  1. IQR inter-quartile range, AR androgen receptor, DCIS ductal carcinoma in situ, LVI lymphovascular invasion, IBC-NST invasive breast carcinoma of no special type.