Table 3 Performance results (for OcnVEGFKO vs WT mice image patches) of an SVC (support vector classifier) with an RBF (radial basis function) kernel (\(C=3\)) with stratified 10-fold cross validation, using 10 or 20 persistence features (see main text) to predict whether an image patch in the test set is from a OcnVEGFKO or WT mouse. Classifiers with 10 features use only quadrant 2 of \(H_0\), whereas 20 features adds additional features from quadrant 1 of \(H_1\), with no improvement. All given measures are mean measures over 100 repeats. Numbers in bold show the best performance results (SHG images, 10 features).
Images | Groups | Features | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | F1 score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHG | Males | 10 (20) | 0.987 (0.986) | 0.986 (0.984) | 0.994 (0.993) | 0.989 (0.989) |
TPaF | Males | 10 (20) | 0.742 (0.740) | 0.810 (0.800) | 0.736 (0.747) | 0.766 (0.768) |
SHG | Females | 10 (20) | 0.778 (0.773) | 0.785 (0.777) | 0.765 (0.765) | 0.767 (0.762) |
TPaF | Females | 10 (20) | 0.658 (0.663) | 0.704 (0.713) | 0.556 (0.553) | 0.609 (0.611) |