Table 1 Summary of the performance of LAMP targeting the B. bovis cytb gene compared to PCR-AGE methods.
Method | Visualization | External PCR (Romero-Salas et al.41) | McNemar’s Test | Cohen’s | Sensitivity | Specificity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pos | Neg | Total | p—value | kappa | (%) | (%) | |||
Internal PCR | UV light | Pos | 33 | 0 | 33 | ||||
control | (Gel | Neg | 0 | 66 | 66 | 1 | 1 | 100 | 100 |
electrophoresis) | Total | 33 | 66 | 99 | |||||
Neon light | Pos | 6 | 0 | 6 | |||||
Neg | 27 | 66 | 93 | 0.00*** | 0.229 | 18.2 | 100 | ||
Total | 33 | 66 | 99 | ||||||
LED light | Pos | 28 | 1 | 29 | |||||
Neg | 3 | 67 | 70 | 0.625 | 0.904 | 90.3 | 98.5 | ||
LAMP | Total | 31 | 68 | 99 | |||||
UV light | Pos | 32 | 0 | 32 | |||||
Neg | 1 | 66 | 68 | 1 | 0.954 | 97 | 100 | ||
Total | 33 | 66 | 99 | ||||||
UV light | Pos | 32 | 0 | 32 | |||||
(Gel | Neg | 1 | 66 | 68 | 1 | 0.954 | 97 | 100 | |
electrophoresis) | Total | 33 | 66 | 99 | |||||