Table 3 Location of ADE factor influences on node-level FC metrics reported for each ROI in which ADE model was applicable, and the corresponding ADE coefficients and “broad-sense” heritability estimates.
From: Environmental effects on brain functional networks in a juvenile twin population
Node-level FC metric | ROI | A, D, E | \({H}_{ADE}^{2}\) |
|---|---|---|---|
Nodal strength of positive weights | Precentral R | A = 7.86%, D = 8.64%, E = 83.50% | 16.49% |
Lingual R | A = 14.15%, D = 8.75%, E = 77.10% | 22.90% | |
Occipital Mid R | A = 0.32%, D = 9.89%, E = 89.79% | 10.20% | |
Occipital Inf R | A = 24.22%, D = 13.74%, E = 62.03% | 37.96% | |
Fusiform L | A = 9.77%, D = 14.32%, E = 75.91% | 24.08% | |
Temporal Pole Sup L | A = 14.14%, D = 2.81%, E = 83.06% | 16.94% | |
Temporal_Pole_Mid_R | A = 1.71%, D = 59.75%, E = 38.54% | 61.45% | |
Nodal strength of negative weights | Rectus R | A = 46.19%, D = 15.72%, E = 38.09% | 61.91% |
Occipital Sup L | A = 11.26%, D = 20.81%, E = 67.93% | 32.07% | |
Nodal degree | Amygdala L | A = 8.95%, D = 0.55%, E = 90.50% | 9.49% |
Fusiform R | A = 2.54%, D = 43.39%, E = 54.07% | 45.93% | |
Temporal Pole Mid R | A = 25.43%, D = 12.20%, E = 62.37% | 37.63% | |
Local efficiency | Calcarine L | A = 4.57%, D = 24.74%, E = 70.69% | 29.30% |
Cuneus L | A = 4.69%, D = 13.27%, E = 82.05% | 17.95% | |
Lingual L | A = 5.28%, D = 22.96%, E = 71.77% | 28.23% | |
Paracentral Lobule L | A = 15.20%, D = 6.24%, E = 78.56% | 21.44% | |
Caudate L | A = 3.24%, D = 36.84%, E = 59.92% | 40.08% | |
Pallidum R | A = 16.28%, D = 37.77%, E = 45.95% | 54.04% | |
Temporal Pole Mid L | A = 11.31%, D = 26.39%, E = 62.29% | 37.70% | |
Clustering coefficient | Insula L | A = 15.21%, D = 19.07%, E = 65.71% | 34.28% |
ParaHippocampal L | A = 3.33%, D = 5.73%, E = 90.94% | 9.06% | |
Calcarine L | A = 4.06%, D = 24.12%, E = 71.82% | 28.18% | |
Cuneus L | A = 1.73%, D = 16.24%, E = 82.02% | 17.98% | |
Fusiform R | A = 27.02%, D = 11.14%, E = 61.83% | 38.16% | |
Pallidum R | A = 2.72%, D = 47.53%, E = 49.75% | 50.24% | |
Temporal Pole Mid L | A = 5.08%, D = 34.66%, E = 60.26% | 39.74% | |
Temporal Inf L | A = 28.22%, D = 23.97%, E = 47.82% | 52.18% | |
Betweenness centrality | Putamen L | A = 43.42%, D = 8.84%, E = 47.74% | 52.26% |
Thalamus R | A = 38.35%, D = 10.91%, E = 50.74% | 49.25% |
