Table 3 Multinomial logistic regression analyses for factors associated with suicide-related experiences.

From: The mediating effects of personality traits on the relationship of youth conduct problems and mood disorders with adulthood suicidality

 

Suicide plans

Suicide attempts

 

Model I

Model II

 

Model I

Model II

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adjust OR (95% CI)

Adjust OR (95% CI)

Crude OR (95% CI)

Adjust OR (95% CI)

Adjust OR (95% CI)

Age (years)

0.95 (0.90–1.00)

0.98 (0.93–1.04)

0.98 (0.92–1.04)

1.00 (0.97–1.03)

1.05 (1.01–1.10)

1.05 (1.00–1.10)

Sex

 Female versus male

0.62 (0.26–1.47)

0.63 (0.25–1.61)

0.77 (0.30–1.96)

2.50 (1.49–4.17)

2.56 (1.34–4.89)

3.09 (1.60–6.00)

Job

 Unemployed versus employed

2.80 (1.22–6.44)

1.75 (0.69–4.41)

1.63 (0.65–4.09)

3.17 (1.84–5.45)

2.45 (1.25–4.78)

2.32 (1.19–4.54)

Conduct problems*

 Dichotomous (with versus without)

1.12 (0.51–2.43)

0.76 (0.32–1.80)

1.37 (0.83–2.26)

1.03 (0.53–1.99)

 Continuous

1.14 (0.99–1.31)

1.09 (0.94–1.26)

1.16 (1.06–1.27)

1.13 (1.01–1.27)

Diagnosis

 Major depressive disorder versus no diagnosis

3.62 (0.82–16.08)

1.55 (0.31–7.75)

1.37 (0.27–6.96)

22.19 (7.95–61.95)

8.60 (2.76–26.80)

7.69 (2.45–24.18)

 Bipolar disorder versus no diagnosis

3.20 (1.29–7.96)

1.58 (0.58–4.33)

1.47 (0.53–4.07)

8.68 (3.93–19.20)

5.13 (2.08–12.65)

4.78 (1.93–11.86)

Eysenck personality questionnaire

 Extraversion

0.91 (0.78–1.06)

0.96 (0.81–1.13)

0.92 (0.78–1.09)

0.92 (0.83–1.01)

1.01 (0.89–1.14)

0.98 (0.86–1.11)

 Neuroticism

1.28 (1.13–1.45)

1.22 (1.06–1.41)

1.21 (1.05–1.39)

1.41 (1.28–1.55)

1.28 (1.15–1.43)

1.27 (1.14–1.41)

  1. *Two definitions of presence of conduct problems were specified into the models separately. In model I, conduct problems were dichotomozed by ≥ 3 and < 3 in numbers, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.325. In model II, the total numbers of conduct problems were specified into the model as a continuous variable, Nagelkerke's R2 = 0.334.