Table 4 Summary of best performing headway and operational scheme for different performance criteria per train capacity and demand level, for baseline Covid-19 crowding multiplier of 1.
Train capacity | Demand (%)\(^1\) | Scenario | Headway (s) | Min. value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Covid-19 cases | ||||
180 | 35 | MB+25D | 230 | 2.08E−01 |
50 | MB+35D | 120 | 2.41E−01 | |
75 | MB+35D | 240 | 2.68E−01 | |
100 | MB+35D | 230 | 3.07E−01 | |
290 | 35 | MB | 210 | 2.76E−01 |
50 | MB+35D | 170 | 3.08E−01 | |
75 | MB+25D | 200 | 3.49E−01 | |
100 | MB+35D | 240 | 4.42E−01 | |
Profit ($) | ||||
Train capacity | Demand (%)\(^1\) | Scenario | Headway (s) | Max. value |
180 | 35 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.81E+04 |
50 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.82E+04 | |
75 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.79E+04 | |
100 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.71E+04 | |
290 | 35 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.80E+04 |
50 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.70E+04 | |
75 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.65E+04 | |
100 | MB+35D | 240 | −2.59E+04 | |
Total journey time (s) | ||||
Train capacity | Demand (%)\(^1\) | Scenario | Headway (s) | Min. value |
180 | 35 | MB+25D | 230 | 3.48E+05 |
50 | MB+25D | 230 | 1.36E+05 | |
75 | MB+35D | 240 | 1.92E+04 | |
100 | FB | 90 | 9.70E+03 | |
290 | 35 | MB | 210 | 7.04E+05 |
50 | MB | 170 | 7.64E+05 | |
75 | MB+35D | 210 | 1.31E+04 | |
100 | MB+35D | 190 | 7.56E+03 | |
Maximum number of passengers on platform | ||||
Train capacity | Demand (%)\(^1\) | Scenario | Headway (s) | Min. value |
180 | 35 | MB+25D | 60 | 28 |
50 | MB+25D | 60 | 39 | |
75 | MB+35D | 60 | 86 | |
100 | MB+25D | 60 | 307 | |
290 | 35 | MB+25D | 60 | 26 |
50 | MB | 60 | 41 | |
75 | MB+25D | 60 | 63 | |
100 | MB | 60 | 85 | |
