Table 6 Results of the Qm and removal % of DB86 dye of various adsorbents reported in the literature.
From: Thermodynamic, kinetic, and isotherm studies of Direct Blue 86 dye absorption by cellulose hydrogel
Adsorbent name | Removal % | Qm (mg/g) | IMs | KMs | Enthalpy | Ref erences |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aspergillus flavus A5p1 | 100 | – | – | – | – | |
Shrimp chitosan continuous | 100 | – | – | – | – | |
Manioc husk activated carbon Commercial brand activated carbon | – – | 6.1 3.7 | – | PSOM | – | |
PnsAC-alginate | 98.4 | 21.6 | LIM | PSOM with IPDM and FDM | Endothermic | |
UVA/ZnO UVA/TiO2 | 69 95.5 | – – | – – | – – | – – | |
Orange peel activated carbon | 92 | 33.78 | LIM | PSOM | – | |
Raw carbon nanotube modified carbon nanotube | – | 69.93 149.25 | LIM | PSOM | – | |
CrossPANI/P-AC(1:0.2) | – | 163.93 | LIM | PSOM | Endothermic | |
Cellulose hyrogel | 60 | 53.76 | TIM | PSOM | Endothermic | This study |
