Table 9 IPWRA outcome model logit regression for ‘treated’ sample-IPV.
From: The association between access to key household resources and violence against women
Variables | Drinking water [95% CI] | Toilet facility [95% CI] |
|---|---|---|
Age | − 0.009 [− 0.013– (− 0.005)] | − 0.007 [− 0.011– (− 0.004)] |
Scheduled tribe | − 0.285 [− 0.397– (− 0.172)] | − 0.326 [− 0.447– (− 0.204)] |
Other backward classes | − 0.056 [− 0.131–0.020] | 0.022 [− 0.065–0.109] |
Other ethnicity | − 0.343 [− 0.431–0.255] | − 0.236 [− 0.331– (− 0.142)] |
Currently married | 0.202 [0.062–0.341] | 0.146 [0.004–0.288] |
Husband/partner’s work status | 0.010 [− 0.124–0.143] | − 0.038 [− 0.183–0.108] |
Control over how to spend own money | − 0.076 [− 0.132– (− 0.019)] | − 0.041 [− 0.101–0.018] |
Education | − 0.030 [− 0.037– (− 0.023)] | − 0.029 [− 0.036– (− 0.021)] |
Husband/partner’s education | − 0.029 [− 0.036– (− 0.021)] | − 0.025 [− 0.033– (− 0.017)] |
Intergenerational IPV | 1.047 [0.983–1.111] | 1.086 [1.019–1.152] |
Husband/partner drinks alcohol | 0.968 [0.910–1.026] | 0.917 [0.856–0.979] |
Work status | 0.181 [0.120–0.243] | 0.231 [0.166–0.296] |
More than one union | 0.439 [0.257–0.620] | 0.388 [0.192–0.583] |
Hindu | 0.026 [− 0.105–0.157] | − 0.112 [− 0.235–0.011] |
Muslim | 0.103 [− 0.047–0.253] | − 0.039 [− 0.182–0.104] |
Sikh | − 0.286 [− 0.504– (− 0.067)] | − 0.439 [− 0.656– (− 0.223)] |
Other religions | − 0.211 [− 0.425–0.004] | − 0.293 [− 0.487– (− 0.099)] |
Psychological control by husband/partner | 0.794 [0.717–0.870] | 0.811 [0.732–0.890] |
IPV justified by woman | 0.505 [0.450–0.560] | 0.546 [0.487–0.605] |
Marital control exercised by husband/partner | 1.195 [1.138–1.252] | 1.194 [1.135–1.253] |
Intercept | − 2.768 [− 3.055– (− 2.481)] | − 2.780 [− 3.081– (− 2.480)] |
