Table 4 Comparison of sensing performance of variables Nanoprobes for detecting some phenolic derivatives.
Detection probe | Detected analyte | Method | Detection range | LOD | Year | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2-(phenyl azo) chromotropic acid-(CH–) conducting polymer (PCH/AGCE) | Hydroquinone | Electrochemical | 0.066 μM | 1–300 μM | 2019 | |
Carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNT-COOH) | Hydroquinone | Electrochemical | 2–280 μM | 0.017 | 2021 | |
Diazo-coupling reaction | Paraaminophenol | Micro determination | 0.0297–0.2229 µg/mL | 0.0185 µg/mL | 2019 | |
Au gold nanoparticle@dithiooxamide functionalized reduced graphene oxide (AuNP@DFG) | Paraaminophenol | Electrochemical | 0.1–130 μM | 11 nM | 2019 | |
The peroxidase-like activity of Fe3O4@Au/MOF | Paraaminophenol | Colorimetric | 0.5–20 μM | 0.27 μM | 2022 | |
Carbon nanotubes (MWCNT) | Hydroquinone | Electrochemical square wave voltammetry (SWV) | 1.0 × 10–5 M to 1.0 × 10–3 M | 5.7 × 10–6 M | 2017 | |
Single-walled carbon nanotube | Hexane | Electrochemical | 2019 | |||
B, N co-doping CQDs | Hydroquinone Resorcinol Para aminophenol Hexane | 5–500 µM | 0.05 µM 0.024 µM 0.032 µM 0.013 µM | This work |
