Table 7 The value of attacker’s resource—A.

From: Security risk assessment of projects in high-risk areas based on attack-defense game model

Attack indicators	Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method	Entropy value method	Combined weighting method	Score (rank)
Social security level	0.023	0.0299	0.024952635	3
Life safety level	0.024	0.0299	0.025669644	2
Economic security level	0.022	0.0346	0.02556568	3
Production security level	0.022	0.0346	0.02556568	3
Terrorist attack	0.021	0.0429	0.027197492	3
Mass unexpected incident	0.025	0.0346	0.027716709	2
Law and order crime	0.021	0.0429	0.027197492	3
War and armed conflict	0.022	0.0346	0.02556568	3
Kidnapping for ransom	0.024	0.0299	0.025669644	2
Number of enemies	0.057	0.0118	0.044208829	2
Key persons involved in terrorism	0.057	0.0118	0.044208829	2
Terrorist organization ideology	0.022	0.0346	0.02556568	3
Social background and intent	0.038	0.0236	0.033924937	3
Actions and capabilities	0.022	0.0346	0.02556568	3
Weapons	0.023	0.0299	0.024952635	3
Historical terrorist event activity in the region	0.021	0.0429	0.027197492	3
Number of enemies	0.042	0.0365	0.040443552	2
Enemy type	0.038	0.0236	0.033924937	3
Enemy purpose	0.038	0.0159	0.03174591	3
Target of attack	0.022	0.0346	0.02556568	3
Attack strategy	0.038	0.0236	0.033924937	3
Weapons	0.021	0.0429	0.027197492	3
Activity of historical public order and criminal offense in the region	0.038	0.0236	0.033924937	3
Ethno-religious type	0.023	0.0299	0.024952635	3
Ethno-religious conflict level	0.021	0.0429	0.027197492	3
Activity of ethnic and religious conflicts	0.021	0.0429	0.027197492	3
Project popularity	0.026	0.0429	0.03078254	2
Number of employees	0.122	0.0299	0.095936574	1
Project scale and importance	0.023	0.0299	0.024952635	3
Important assets and dangerous goods storage level	0.025	0.0346	0.027716709	2
Historical attack interest against the project	0.059	0.0429	0.054443853	2
Overall Score	2.489162882

Back to article page

Quick links

Search

Quick links