Table 3 Mean N recovery ratio (N accumulation in plant material per total N from applied N), leaf area index (LAI), water productivity (WP; grain yield corrected to 15.5% moisture content per total crop ET), N productivity (NP; grain yield corrected to 15.5% moisture content per total N applied), cumulative N2O emissions (total across the growing season), and emissions factor (EF; %) for the same water and N treatments described in Table 1. Values in parentheses show standard error. Different letters indicate significant differences between N treatments within water treatments. ANOVA P-values for each main effect are presented at the bottom of the table with significant effects (P < 0.05) in bold. An observed—expected yield assessment of 0 indicates that the full expected yield was achieved (that the observed yield was the same as the expected yield that was estimated from total N that was applied and present as residual).
From: High N availability decreases N uptake and yield under limited water availability in maize
Water Trt | N Trt | N recovery ratio | LAI | WP (kg grain mm−1 ET) | NP (kg grain kg−1 N applied) | Cumulative N2O emission (g N2O-N ha−1) | EF (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FW | H | 1.01 (0.07) a | 4.7 (0.3) | 23.1 (1.4) | 47 (3) a | 477 (76) | 0.17 (0.03) |
M | 1.47 (0.08) b | 4.8 (0.1) | 25.5 (0.6) | 73 (2) b | 629 (152) | 0.31 (0.08) | |
L | 1.61 (0.10) c | 4.6 (0.1) | 22.9 (1.2) | 81 (4) c | 400 (40) | 0.25 (0.020 | |
LW | H | 0.81 (0.04) a | 3.9 (0.1) | 21.2 (0.9) | 38 (2) a | 525 (71) | 0.18 (0.02) |
M | 1.18 (0.03) b | 4.3 (0.2) | 23.4 (1.0) | 58 (3) b | 373 (75) | 0.17 (0.04) | |
L | 1.80 (0.04) c | 4.3 (0.2) | 24.0 (1.4) | 87 (5) c | 392 (59) | 0.27 (0.04) | |
ANOVA | |||||||
Water | 0.04 | < 0.01 | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.33 | 0.34 | |
N | < 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.69 | < 0.01 | 0.28 | 0.05 | |
W × N | 0.03 | 0.30 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 0.63 | 0.74 | |