Table 1 Explanation of system’s feature.
Symbols | Explanation | Values |
|---|---|---|
\(\mathcal {S}_{\textbf{f}}\) | Number of females susceptible to nutrients | 30 |
\(\bar{\mathcal {M}}_{\textbf{b}}\) | Number of poor nutrient boys | 2 |
\(\bar{\mathcal {M}}_{\textbf{g}}\) | Number of poor nutrient girls | 4 |
\(\bar{\mathcal {U}}\) | Percentage of underweight individuals | 1 |
\(\mathcal {B}\) | Generation of new female | 0.01 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\varepsilon\) | Vertical spread to a new born community | 0.001 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\lambda _{\textbf{b}}\) | Emaciated boy’s transfer rate from vulnerable female cohort | 0.1 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\lambda _{\textbf{g}}\) | Emaciated girl’s transfer rate from vulnerable female cohort | 0.2 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\vartheta\) | Death rate | 0.1 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\vartheta _{\textbf{b}}\) | Natural restoration rate | 0.3 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\gamma _{\textbf{b}}\) | The proportion of boys who progress from malnourishment to underweight | 0.01 cell ml\(^{-1}\) day\(^{-1}\) person\(^{-1}\) |
\(\gamma _{\textbf{g}}\) | The proportion of girls who progress from malnourishment to underweight | 0.1 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\chi _{\textbf{b}}\) | Proportion of underweight shifted to \(\bar{\mathcal {M}}_{\textbf{b}}\) | 0.014 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\chi _{\textbf{g}}\) | Proportion of underweight shifted to \(\bar{\mathcal {M}}_{\textbf{g}}\) | 0.01 day\(^{-1}\) |
\(\vartheta _{1}\) | Health promoting candidacy evaluation (per day) | [0,1] |
\(\vartheta _{2}\) | Undernourished girl’s treatment rate (per day) | [0,1] |
\(\delta _{\textbf{g}}\) | Undernourished girl’s recovery rate | 0.1 day\(^{-1}\) |
