Figure 1 | Scientific Reports

Figure 1

From: Similarities and discrepancies between commercially available bioelectrical impedance analysis system and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for body composition assessment in 10–14-year-old children

Figure 1Figure 1

Bland–Altman plot of body composition data obtained with bioelectrical impedance-based methods (BIA) and dual-energy Xray absorption method (DXA). (1-A) fat mass in boys, (1-B) fat-mass in girls, (1-C) fat-mass in all participants, (2-A) fat-free mass in boys, (2-B) fat-free mass in girls, (2-C) fat-free mass in all participants,  (3-A) Percentage of body fat in boys, (3-B) percentage of body fat in girls, (3-C) percentage of body fat in all participants, (4-A) lean body mass in boys, (4-B) lean body mass in girls, (4-C) lean body mass in all participants, (5-A) Bone mineral contents in boys, (5-B) bone mineral contents in girls, (5-C) bone mineral contents in all participants, (6-A) body mass in boys, (6-B) body mass in girls, (6-C) body mass in all participants. BIA, bioelectrical impedance analysis; DXA, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; FM, fat mass; FFM, fat-free mass; PBF, percentage of body fat; LBM, lean body mass; BMC, bone mineral contents; BM, body mass.

Back to article page