Table 2 Significant results of the voxel-wise functional asymmetry analysis.

From: No evidence from a negative mood induction fMRI task for frontal functional asymmetry as a suitable neurofeedback target

Ā 

pFWE-corr

Cluster size

Peak t value

MNI

x

y

z

ALFF change of rMDDa

0.031*

47

7.13

āˆ’ā€‰38

āˆ’ā€‰14

40

fALFF change of rMDDb

0.011*

48

4.99

āˆ’ā€‰36

āˆ’ā€‰14

42

4.08

āˆ’ā€‰36

āˆ’ā€‰6

30

PANAS negative change correlates to ALFF change of rMDDc

0.026*

48

4.39

āˆ’ā€‰20

āˆ’ā€‰52

āˆ’ā€‰16

4.10

āˆ’ā€‰14

āˆ’ā€‰58

āˆ’ā€‰14

PANAS negative change correlates to fALFF change of rMDDd

0.025*

42

4.60

22

āˆ’ā€‰90

āˆ’ā€‰16

  1. aALFF functional asymmetry has higher asymmetric activation in the induction phase compared to rest.
  2. bfALFF functional asymmetry has higher asymmetric activation in the induction phase compared to rest.
  3. cThe change in the PANAS negative score correlates to the change in ALFF functional asymmetry.
  4. dThe change in the PANAS negative score correlates to the change in fALFF functional asymmetry. Change is defined as induction—rest.
  5. *p < 0.05.