Table 3 Simulated power results given \(\sigma \), \(\beta _{1,j}\) , \(\beta _{2,j}\) and \(\beta _{3,j}\) for the homologous and standard cross-sectional hypotheses.
From: Leveraging homologous hypotheses for increased efficiency in tumor growth curve testing
\(\sigma \) | \(\beta _{1,j}\) | \(\beta _{2,j}\) | \(\beta _{3,j}\) | Homologous | t Test | \(\bar{\hat{\rho }}_{0,j}\) | \(\bar{\hat{\rho }}_{1,j}\) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power | Power | ||||||
0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 0 |
0.4 | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.73 |
0.4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0 | 0.91 |
0.4 | 0 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
0.4 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.73 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 0 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.74 | 0.95 |
0.4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 0 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
0.4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.9 | 0.97 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 | 0.55 | 0.57 | 0 | 0 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.39 | 0.01 | 0.74 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.24 | 0 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.54 | 0.31 | 0.74 | 0.73 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.21 | 0.74 | 0.91 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.17 | 0.73 | 0.95 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 1 | 0 | 0.54 | 0.17 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.54 | 0.14 | 0.9 | 0.95 |
0.4 | 0.5 | 1 | 1 | 0.54 | 0.12 | 0.9 | 0.97 |
0.4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0 | 0 |
0.4 | 1 | 0 | 0.5 | 0.96 | 0.85 | 0 | 0.73 |
0.4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.96 | 0.56 | 0 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 1 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.96 | 0.72 | 0.73 | 0.73 |
0.4 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.96 | 0.5 | 0.74 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.97 | 0.35 | 0.74 | 0.95 |
0.4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0.97 | 0.39 | 0.9 | 0.9 |
0.4 | 1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.97 | 0.29 | 0.91 | 0.95 |
0.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.96 | 0.23 | 0.91 | 0.97 |