Table 2 Comparison of working time (seconds) for wireless and wired IOSs in the first, second, third, and fourth iterations (N = 14 per IOS type).
From: Prediction of learning curves of wired and wireless intraoral scanners
Trial no | IOS type | Mean | SD | Median | 95% confidence interval | P | P | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower limit | Upper limit | Wireless IOS | Wired IOS | ||||||||
1 | Wireless IOS | 564.07 | 92.13 | 580.50 | 515.80 | 612.33 | 0.008* | < 0.001 ** | A | < 0.001 ** | A |
Wired IOS | 456.14 | 88.41 | 462.50 | 409.82 | 502.45 | ||||||
2 | Wireless IOS | 438.78 | 83.37 | 462.00 | 395.11 | 482.45 | 0.077 | AB | AB | ||
Wired IOS | 392.07 | 72.79 | 415.00 | 353.94 | 430.20 | ||||||
3 | Wireless IOS | 396.85 | 69.02 | 413.00 | 360.70 | 433.01 | 0.035* | B | BC | ||
Wired IOS | 355.50 | 55.37 | 373.00 | 326.49 | 384.50 | ||||||
4 | Wireless IOS | 348.71 | 56.42 | 358.00 | 319.15 | 378.27 | 0.194 | B | C | ||
Wired IOS | 315.57 | 55.73 | 326.50 | 286.37 | 344.76 | ||||||
